Which statement best describes the fallacy 'post hoc ergo propter hoc'?

Which statement best describes the fallacy 'post hoc ergo propter hoc'?

• A. Concluding that because event B followed event A, A caused B, without evidence.
• B. Assuming A caused B only with evidence.
• C. Believing two events are unrelated despite timing.
• D. Attributing a single event to multiple unrelated causes.

Answer: (A)